In which we have reader questions
The first question--and these are in no particular order--is from reader Amanda who wanted to know why some authors choose to use a nom de plume. She was inquiring specifically about established authors using pseudonyms, and the answer is pretty straightforward. When an established author is getting ready for a fresh start--new publisher, new genre, etc.--they may decide that a change of name is in order. (There are some authors who find that their original publisher actually owns their name, even if it is their birth name, which is both strange and unseemly, but such is the nature of publishing at times.) Usually, the various pen names are attached to specific genres. For instance, Eleanor Hibbert wrote Victoria Holt books--straight up Gothic romances, Philippa Carr--historical family saga, and Jean Plaidy--royal biography. That made it extremely easy for her to build a following in each genre without carrying any specific expectations from her other pen names. And people knew that buying a Victoria Holt book would never give the same experience as a Jean Plaidy. (The odd exception is The Queen's Confession, an "autobiography" of Marie Antoinette, which was published under Victoria Holt rather than Jean Plaidy. It seemed more "Plaidy-like", but it may have been the only first-person royal narrative and thus read more like the Holt books.) Hope that helps!


Comments
Thanks
Thanks for answering my question, Deanna. I understand a bit more why it's done. Still, it frustrates me to know that an author that I admire and follow has penned another series that I know nothing about.
I'm curious if YOU decided to use a nom de plume what would it be?