In which I finally got to the movies!
I cannot tell you the last movie I saw in the theater. No, really. It seems that two or three times a year a flurry of movies I want to see will come out all at once, and I don't manage to see any of them until they show up on Encore in a year or two. Le sigh. And movie-going itself has become an extremely questionable pleasure given the proliferation of cell phones and PDAs and the people who wield them. Honestly, unless you're a transplant surgeon and there's a kidney in a cooler somewhere waiting for you, TURN IT OFF. You're not that important. At the risk of sounding cranky, I also long-ago gave up the idea of seeing a movie on a weekend night. The last time I had an encounter with "tweens" was during "Casino Royale" when I tore a strip off the girl sitting next to me for talking INCESSANTLY when Judi Dench was whupping up on Daniel Craig. People, you cannot mess with Bond.
Anyway, it had been AGES since the husband and I managed a date, so we took ourselves off to a movie at ten a.m. Monday. You probably think that's a typo, but seriously. Ten in the morning. It was GLORIOUS. There were about four other couples than us--all middle-aged, which was perfect. Middle-aged couples are the best movie-goers because they actually watch the movie. Very young couples are too busy slurping on each other, and very old couples are always asking each other what just happened. LOUDLY.
So we went to the first showing of "Angels & Demons", and I found myself scratching my head. A LOT. Most of the changes were vast improvements over the book--eliminating Langdon's presence in the helicopter was a moral necessity because between you and me, it was ABSURD. But some of the changes seemed to be for the sake of change, and I would dearly love to know why. (And one--the camerlengo's virtually non-existent motive in the film--was inexplicable.) One of the biggest criticisms of "The Da Vinci Code" was how much people just stood around and talked, and there's less of it here, but that also means there's less discussion of art and symbolism--my favorite parts of the books, although I dearly loved seeing a dramatization of conclave, however imperfect. I am a bit of a Vatican geek when it comes to conclave. I watched CNN round the clock during the last papal election. Waiting for a puff of smoke doesn't sound that interesting, but I find it RIVETING. (I called it wrong, though. I thought Cardinal Lustiger of France would be elected. Ah, well.) In all, it was very lovely just to be away with the husband for a few hours with a passably good movie and some VERY good popcorn. This should hold me over until the Dillinger film with Johnny Depp...
Anyway, it had been AGES since the husband and I managed a date, so we took ourselves off to a movie at ten a.m. Monday. You probably think that's a typo, but seriously. Ten in the morning. It was GLORIOUS. There were about four other couples than us--all middle-aged, which was perfect. Middle-aged couples are the best movie-goers because they actually watch the movie. Very young couples are too busy slurping on each other, and very old couples are always asking each other what just happened. LOUDLY.
So we went to the first showing of "Angels & Demons", and I found myself scratching my head. A LOT. Most of the changes were vast improvements over the book--eliminating Langdon's presence in the helicopter was a moral necessity because between you and me, it was ABSURD. But some of the changes seemed to be for the sake of change, and I would dearly love to know why. (And one--the camerlengo's virtually non-existent motive in the film--was inexplicable.) One of the biggest criticisms of "The Da Vinci Code" was how much people just stood around and talked, and there's less of it here, but that also means there's less discussion of art and symbolism--my favorite parts of the books, although I dearly loved seeing a dramatization of conclave, however imperfect. I am a bit of a Vatican geek when it comes to conclave. I watched CNN round the clock during the last papal election. Waiting for a puff of smoke doesn't sound that interesting, but I find it RIVETING. (I called it wrong, though. I thought Cardinal Lustiger of France would be elected. Ah, well.) In all, it was very lovely just to be away with the husband for a few hours with a passably good movie and some VERY good popcorn. This should hold me over until the Dillinger film with Johnny Depp...


Comments
That is what I hate about
That is what I hate about younger movie goers. I may be 21 years old, but teenagers and children kind of annoy me when it comes to going to the movies. I haven't been to a movie in ages and I'd rather stay at home and watch them either on DVD or on HBO rather than go, but only on special occasions will I actually go. Anyway, I've been seriously wanting to see the Dillinger movie as well, mainly because Johnny Depp will be in it and he is my favorite actor (just look at Sweeney Todd and The Pirates of the Caribbean movies, they were fantastic). Anyway, I've seen bits and pieces of "The Da Vinci Code" and thought it was interesting. I still need to watch Angels & Demons.
I agree with you about movie
I agree with you about movie audiences nowadays.... when I saw Dark Knight a few months back, there was a woman sitting behind me with 5 little kids and in-between their incessant questions and screams of fear, her cell phone rang... and she answered it!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Needless to say, I had a few choice things to tell her about courtesy! ARGH! Anyway, it was a great film nonetheless.
I agree,younge couples do
I agree,younge couples do tend to make out during movies, the elderly ask questions loudly and tweens are just plain annoying.However, when I go to the movies I don't latch on to a face and only come up for air and pop corn. I actually want to see the movie, thats why I paid a 12 bucks. I love your line about not being that important, priceless! Some man sat next to me during X-Man orgins(Huge Jackmen Yummm!)and was talking on his blue tooth the whole time--'Hello Mr. Stockbroker, you don't need to buy and sell stock at the movies, during Wolverine's naked slashing...do you?'I need to see that movie(Angels & Demons) pronto!
Heh. Your comment about the
Heh. Your comment about the older couples cracked me up. I was in a play at the beginning of the year, and our dress rehearsal was attended by folks from the local nursing homes.... the comments were hilarious. I came in in the third act..."Who is that? Look her up in the program...oh that must be the MAID" and so on and so forth.....
Ah movies, yes I remember
Ah movies, yes I remember those. Nowadays, when I go to the movies it is to watch a G rated animated feature. The trip to the movies now includes two trips to the bathroom (one is always a false alarm, of course) with my little one, numerous explanations of what is going on the screen and a bag full of various snacks. I completely agree with you on matinees, I love them. For some reason evening showtimes attract rowdy crowds, and I stopped going to those a few years back after someone bumped into me while I was really, really pregnant. As an aside, I finished Silent on the Moor this weekend. I took my time with it and I savoured every page. I really loved the novel, and the whole Egyptology angle really added an extra macabre layer to the whole story. I can't wait to find out the next locale of Julia Grey series.
As one half of one of those
As one half of one of those "older" couples, I must concur with your assessment of movies. That's why we go to the early screenings, fewer people and if my wife wants to see a chick flick, my snooze alarm doesn't bother anyone.